WEEKLY COMMENTARY: What Is The Point of Monthly Communion at CPC?

June 4, 2019

Last autumn, my twenty-five year old nephew visited from the Mid-West to attend to some business in New York City. As it happened, he was with us over a Sunday, so I invited him to attend the CPC Worship Service with us. Then I remembered that it would be the first Sunday of the month, when CPC regularly offers Communion as part of the Sunday Worship Service. I thought I had better mention that to Harry.

Harry confessed he did not attend church much, but he said he did not remember “Communion.” He wondered if it might be the same thing as the Sacrament of the Lord’s Supper, which was celebrated in his parent’s church. I told him they were essentially the same thing —- each with a slightly different emphasis.

At CPC, I told Harry (not unlike his parent’s church) we observe Communion because Jesus told us to do so, and naturally we do try to observe the commands of Jesus.

On the night he was betrayed, Jesus had met in an inn’s upper room with his disciples to eat a meal with them. The Bible tells us (1 Corinthians 11: 23-26) :

“The Lord Jesus, on the night he was betrayed, took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and said, ‘This is my body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of me.’ In the same way, after supper he took the cup, saying, ‘This cup is the new covenant in my blood; do this whenever you drink it, in remembrance of me.’ For whenever you eat this bread and drink of this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes.”

Then, in 1 Corinthians 11:28 – 29:

“Everyone ought to examine themselves before they eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body of Christ, they eat and drink judgment on themselves.”

At CPC, I told Harry, we regard Communion (the Lord’s Supper) as a Sacrament of the New Testament, and that by taking the bread and wine (grape juice), those that make themselves “worthy” by silently confessing their sins to Jesus Christ, communicate directly to him for their spiritual nourishment. At the heart of the Communion is the “conversation” with Christ. Importantly, there is self-examination taking place, because it would be hypocrisy for us to pretend that we are in communion with the Holy One while actually cherishing known sin in our hearts. We each seek to identify recent sin and beg forgiveness. 

Harry asked whether during observance of the Sacrament, the bread and wine really become the body and blood of Jesus? He wondered, when one is seeking to be in communion with Jesus, how could Jesus participate? I told him that there are three different Christian views on this question:

—- First, that the bread and wine become the actual body and blood of Christ. This is the Roman Catholic belief, and it is called Transubstantiation. Before the Mass, the elements are merely bread and wine. But during the Mass, through the ministrations of the priest, they are changed so that, although worshipers perceive only the bread and wine, they nevertheless actually eat and drink the body and blood of Jesus.

—- Secondly, that the bread and wine are unchanged elements, but Christ’s presence by faith is made spiritually real, in and through them. This was the view of John Calvin particularly, but also of other Protestant Reformers 

—- that Christ is present in the Communion Service, but spiritually rather than physically. Rev. James Montgomery Boice tells us that Calvin called this “the real presence” to indicate that a spiritual presence is every bit as real as a physical one.

—- Thirdly, the bread and wine are completely unchanged, but are used as symbols representing Christ’s body and blood, in remembrance of his enduring sacrifice. This theory assumes Jesus is not present at all, at least no more than he is present all the time and in everything. To those who hold this view, Communion takes on an exclusively memorial character. It is only a remembrance of Christ’s death.

In his book, Foundations of Christian Faith, Rev. James Montgomery Boice discusses the merits of these three theories, as follows:

“To begin with, we must say that there can be no quarrel with the memorial theory, since it is true as far as it goes. The only question is whether more than remembrance is involved. The real division is between the view of the majority of Reformers and the doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church. Those who favor a literal, physical presence (and Luther was one, though he did not accept the theory of Transubstantiation), argue from a literal interpretation of Christ’s words: “This is my body.” (Mark 14 : 22) But that hardly decides the matter, because such expressions occur frequently in the Bible with obviously figurative or representational meanings.”

I told Harry that we (at CPC) speak of “the real presence” of the Lord Jesus Christ in the Communion Service as far as we know it, and we seek to respond to Him and to serve Him. But, we readily admit that there are times when this is difficult and the Lord does not seem to be present. Whether because of our sin, our fatigue, or simply our lack of faith. Sometimes, Jesus does seem to be far away. Though we continue on in the Christian life, and in service, we long for the day when we will see Him face to face, and be like Him. Our Communion Service is a reminder of that day. It is an encouragement to our faith and an impulse to reach for a higher level of holiness in the daily lives of each of us.

_________________________________________________________________________

These thoughts are brought to you by CPC’s Adult Spiritual Development Team, hoping to encourage you to pursue some personal spiritual growth this summer at CPC.

___________________________________________________________________________